Atypical Non-tremor Parkinson’s Can Be Confused With PTSD

Dr. C avatar

by Dr. C |

Share this article:

Share article via email
routine | Parkinson's News Today | banner image for Dr. C's

“You’re a veteran. All Vietnam vets have PTSD.”

This simple statement misses the mark. Prior to my Parkinson’s diagnosis, I was not diagnosed with any of the symptoms attributable to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite having PTSD ruled out by psychologists twice, it still rears its ugly head. Yes, many vets have PTSD. However, I think there are just as many Parkinson’s patients who have acquired similar symptoms, such as in my case, and have atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s — not PTSD.

In my previous columns, I suggested how Parkinson’s may cause PTSD (largely due to the losses and stress involved). With the discovery of a possible atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s associated with a malfunctioning second dopamine center, I have a fresh take on what may be happening to me.

I did not have life-altering anxiety prior to my Parkinson’s diagnosis. For 40 years, I was a fully functioning member of society with decades of successful employment in several highly cognitive professions. It is the atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s that causes symptoms that present like PTSD and confusion in the diagnosis.

The following information is very clinical but worth reading. A 2013 article from the Journal of Depression and Anxiety states:

“The diagnostic criteria for DSM-5 PTSD include symptoms and signs grouped into five main clusters, including exposure to severe stress (Cluster A), intrusion symptoms (Cluster B), persistent avoidance (Cluster C), negative alterations in cognitions and mood associated with the traumatic events (Cluster D), and hyperarousal (Cluster E). In addition, the duration of the disorder must be more than one month (Cluster F), the disturbance must cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning (Cluster G), and the disturbance must not be attributable to the physiological effects of a substance or another medical condition (Cluster G). The one new diagnostic cluster (Cluster D) in the proposed diagnostic system for PTSD, which was not present in DSM-IV, involves negative alteration in cognition and mood associated with the traumatic event, as evidenced by two or more of seven listed symptoms.”

If you are a combat war vet like me, then the chances are that you fit the first criterion: exposure to extreme stress. But one doesn’t need combat to meet that criterion. Being told you have Parkinson’s and dealing with the progression can cause extreme stress.

With Parkinson’s, there is an added handicap: the malfunctioning second dopamine center. It malfunctions in a way that mimics PTSD, causing many of the symptoms that are diagnostically associated with PTSD. This includes intrusive thoughts, changes in cognitive functioning, changes in mood, hyperarousal, and significant impairment in functioning. In my case, attribution of PTSD continues to be suggested as a stand-alone clinical diagnosis. It serves as a barrier to quality treatment. The most important part of the PTSD criteria is that the symptoms must not be attributable to an organic malfunction. If the practitioner misses the fact that an organic issue is the main source of the problem, then the result will be poor treatment and poor outcomes.

In my story about the untrained dog crashing through my garden, I mention that the brain places a high emotional value on life-threatening situations. It will further enhance the emotive value of those memories. The higher the emotive value, the more likely it is that the memories will become intrusive. This is because the brain is designed to pay attention to memories that have the highest emotion value — those deemed to be most significant to our survival. It is a system that has served our species well over the past millions of years. The problem with atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s is that it comes with its own version of heightened emotional input due to a faulty second dopamine center. It looks like PTSD, but it is not.

Both extreme trauma and the faulty second dopamine center create heightened emotive input. It can be confusing to both patient and practitioner. If the practitioner can take the time to ask the patient about symptoms associated with a faulty second dopamine center, then it may be possible to improve treatment for those Parkinson’s patients who also have PTSD-like symptoms. I propose we develop new diagnostic criteria and add atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s so that a more accurate diagnosis can be made by practitioners.

Maybe next time I see a neurologist, he won’t say, “You don’t show a typical Parkinson’s presentation. And you may have PTSD.” Instead, the doctor will say with confidence, “You are a textbook example of atypical non-tremor Parkinson’s disease with symptoms that look like PTSD.”

***

Note: Parkinson’s News Today is strictly a news and information website about the disease. It does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. This content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website. The opinions expressed in this column are not those of Parkinson’s News Today or its parent company, Bionews, and are intended to spark discussion about issues pertaining to Parkinson’s disease.

Comments

Peter Harlan avatar

Peter Harlan

For readers who have only recently discovered your column, can you suggest a source of succinct information about the “conductor” concept you refer to. The thought of reading all of your previous columns is too daunting, I’m afraid.

Reply
Dr. C avatar

Dr. C

Hi Peter ~ We feel the same way that we have presented a lot of information and it is difficult to access all the columns when they are published separately. I can refer you to my column, "Spectrum Stage Theory Seeks a Better Understanding of Parkinson's" as a synopsis. To that end, we are pursuing the publication of the columns in a book: "Possibilities with Parkinson’s: A Fresh Look And Collection of Essays on the Journey of Discovery". Our intent is that (being readers of books ourselves) it might be easier to have someone pick up a book, and refer back to a previous essay or train of thought, than try to navigate through online essays. Our publisher, Atmosphere Press, has the manuscript now for final editorial review. He is projecting a publish date this summer.
I appreciate your comment and hope that you keep checking in on my columns and BioNews Today.
Dr. C.

Reply
Barry Meggs avatar

Barry Meggs

As I am currently waiting for investigation of possible non-tremor Parkinson's myself, resulting from engineered silica nanoparticle exposure, I have read about similar US military exposures and their resulting conditions. You may be interested to learn that a lot of the lubricants used by the military include these particles. While I am unsure about effects of other forms of exposure I personally know that inhalation of the particles results in direct entry to the brain; the blood brain barrier does not pose any challenge to nanoparticles. An article published earlier this year connected silica nanoparticles, and their deposition in the striatum, with the development of Parkinson's diesease. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8792744/

Reply
Dr. C. avatar

Dr. C.

Hi Barry ~ Thanks for the reference. I'll check it out. The US military gave me the opportunity to be exposed to toxic water at Camp LeJeune (further study acknowledged causal link to PD) and Vietnam tour dispersed Agent Orange and white phosphorus. So what's another dose of silicon nanoparticles? Another possible source really isn't going to change my situation. Nanoparticles are very cool.
Thanks for reading the columns
Dr. C.

Reply
Barry Meggs avatar

Barry Meggs

Hi Dr C, Now that I know the details a quick search using 'camp lejeune water contamination parkinson's' brings up quite a list of links connecting the contamination and Parkinson's. I see that one was contaminated with a range of toxins including trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene, benzene, and vinyl chloride. I've only researched TCE and benzene, due to previous exposures. They are both mutagenic, so contributing to the development of later autoimmune conditions and severe diseases. The TCE disrupts normal cellular aerobic respiration by inhibiting pyruvate dehydrogenase via its metabolite, dichloroacetic acid. Another metabolite, S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl)-L-cysteine, stimulates compensatory utilization of glycerol, lipid, and amino acid metabolism, whenever you are exposed to it, temporarily restoring some of your function. Kind of a devil's choice; inducing chronic fatigue when you aren't exposed and long term disease risks when you are. Benzene isn't much different. You probably already have this link between TCE and Parkinson's; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29270919/

Reply

Leave a comment

Fill in the required fields to post. Your email address will not be published.