Well, another question might be “What are the proper criteria for taking a drug for ailments?” For example, in my case, I have serious Restless Leg Syndrome. I’m now taking Sinemet plus and Mirapexin, but I know that I’m running the risk of getting dystonia from the Sinemet and edema from the Mirapexin. But without these drugs I would now be frequently miserable. Therefore, their use is justified.
Per contra, I have serious insomnia; I’ve had trouble sleeping all my life, my mother and sister have always had trouble sleeping, and now with Parkinson’s it has gotten worse. Sleep is important, so should I be taking something? Well, I seem able to function well on 2-3 hours sleep, occasional catnaps are always refreshing, and from time to time I do get a good night’s sleep. Finally, normal doses of conventional sleeping pills have no effect. Therefore, I don’t take anything to sleep.
As for side effects, my wife, who is a nurse and should know better, never reads the leaflet that comes with a drug. “If I read about all the possible side effects I’d never take anything”. But the leaflets have to list every possible side effect, even if there’s only a one in a hundred chance of occurrence. So, as you say Jean, though “the side effects described in the commercials seem almost as bad as what the medication is attempting to fix”, I think it’s good to remember that the chances of these side effects ever becoming manifest are relatively remote.